ISSN: 2149-2247 | E-ISSN: 2149-2549
Erciyes Medical Journal Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services Versus Outpatient Clinics [Erciyes Med J]
Erciyes Med J. 2021; 43(5): 438-442 | DOI: 10.14744/etd.2021.24603

Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services Versus Outpatient Clinics

Sonay Özdemir1, Pelin Ünsal2
1Department of Family Medicine, Gaziosmanpaşa Taksim Training nad Research Hospital, İstanbul, Turkey
2Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

Objective: Warfarin use is difficult due to the necessity for regular international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring and drug–drug interaction. However, it is still the most widely preferred oral anticoagulant. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and reliability of warfarin use by patients attending outpatient clinics (OC) or who received home health services (HHS).
Materials and Methods: This study included 204 patients followed by OC and HHS and receiving warfarin treatment. Demographic and clinical characteristics and INR monitoring frequency were evaluated. Moreover, complications were retrospectively questioned. The interactions between warfarin use and other medications were assessed. Hypertension, Abnormal renal/liver function, Stroke, Bleeding history or predisposition, Labile INR, Elderly, Drugs/alcohol (HAS-BLED) and Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation (ATRIA) scores were calculated in the atrial fibrillation (AF) group.
Results: The patients followed by HHS were older (78 vs. 68, p<0.001). Cerebrovascular disease was more frequent in the HSS group (51% vs. 29.4%, p=0.002) while AF was more common in the OC group (65.7% vs. 43.1%, p=0.001). Patients with an INR level in the subtherapeutic range were more common in the HHS group (42.2% vs. 24.5%, p=0.025), and thromboembolic complications were also observed more frequently (14.7% versus 10.8%, p=0.013). More than half of the individuals using drugs interacted with warfarin. In AF subgroup, the HAS-BLED and ATRIA scores were higher for HHS group compared with the OC group [HAS-BLED, 2 (1–4) vs. 2 (0–5); ATRIA, 5 (1–7) vs. 2 (0–7); p=0.032 and p<0.001, respectively].
Conclusion: The current study showed that HHS and OC staff should regularly monitor patients’ INR levels and pay attention to drug–drug interactions to reduce complications.

Keywords: Warfarin, outpatient clinic, home health services, atrial fibrillation

Sonay Özdemir, Pelin Ünsal. Warfarin Treatment: Home Health Services Versus Outpatient Clinics. Erciyes Med J. 2021; 43(5): 438-442

Corresponding Author: Pelin Ünsal, Türkiye
LookUs & Online Makale